linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for XM25QH64C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3bb5ae427dc01b82be4434dff39e6c8e@walle.cc>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:19:34 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Reto Schneider <code@...o-schneider.ch>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
        Reto Schneider <reto.schneider@...qvarnagroup.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for XM25QH64C

Hi Reto,

Am 2021-06-17 13:59, schrieb Reto Schneider:
>> NB. XMC ignores the continuation codes and this particular device will
>> collide with M25PE64/M45PE64. Although I couldn't find any datasheet,
>> so I don't know if these devices actually exist.
> 
> M25PE64 yields quite some hits on Google. Is supporting this (all?)
> XMC device in upstream a good idea nevertheless? Does "first come,
> first served" apply here?

That is up to the maintainers, but sooner or later we will have to face
the problem regarding the duplicate IDs.

-michael