[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1192147.1623931489@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:04:49 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: fix tracepoint string placement with built-in AFS
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Looks fine to me, and even saves 4 bytes on 64 bit machines (events are
> rounded up to 4 byte increments, so the u16 is no different than a u32
> here).
Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists