[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d708823a-3b28-2541-da06-86eb41484aaa@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:40:41 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix null pointer dereference in
remove callback
On 6/18/21 5:06 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:19:25PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>>> If attach has not been called, unloading the driver can result in a null
>>> pointer dereference in mipi_dsi_detach as ctx->dsi has not been assigned
>>> yet.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be done in a brige .detach() operation instead ?
>>
>
> Could you please take a look?
> I don't have a working setup to test moving the code to detach.
I just replied to your other email regarding bringing the chip up, so
please bring your setup up first, then test this patch again, and then
let's revisit this topic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists