[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfdd1d6b-77a3-450b-71f4-63e9cc314ace@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:54:00 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.13-rc6 regression to 5.12.x: kernel OOM and panic during
kernel boot in low memory Xen VM's (256MB assigned memory).
On 18/06/2021 03.06, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 17/06/2021 21:39, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> OK, done some experimentation and it seems with 256M assigned to the VM
> it was almost at the edge of OOM with the 5.12 kernel as well in the
> config I am using it.
> With v5.12 when I assign 240M it boots, with 230M it doesn't. With 5.13
> the tipping point seems to be around 265M and 270M, so my config was
> already quite close to the edge.
>
> The "direct kernel boot" feature I'm using just seems somewhat memory
> hungry, but using another compression algorithm for the kernel and
> initramfs already helped in my case.
>
> So sorry for the noise, clearly user-error.
Hm, perhaps, but I'm still a bit nervous about that report from Oliver
Sang/kernel test robot, which was for a VM equipped with 16G of memory.
But despite quite a few attempts, I haven't been able to reproduce that
locally, so unfortunately I have no idea what's going on.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists