[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210621085431.whk5z3gohk3pb6j7@bogus>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:54:31 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
souvik.chakravarty@....com, alex.bennee@...aro.org,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, mikhail.golubev@...nsynergy.com,
anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com,
Vasyl Vavrychuk <Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com>,
Andriy Tryshnivskyy <Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] firmware: arm_scmi, smccc, mailbox: Make
shmem based transports optional
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:09:21PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:22 PM Peter Hilber
> <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
>
> .....
>
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > menuconfig MAILBOX
> > bool "Mailbox Hardware Support"
> > + select ARM_SCMI_HAVE_SHMEM
> > help
> > Mailbox is a framework to control hardware communication between
> > on-chip processors through queued messages and interrupt driven
> >
> Isn't this too generic?
> Not all platforms, with a mailbox controller, use SCMI as the protocol.
>
Yikes! I agree Jassi, this looks super hack.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists