[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY2q8Vw90=qEiNSOUZ39ZmX0ECShTvSidLoYCuZ-xGy-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:09:21 -0500
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
souvik.chakravarty@....com, alex.bennee@...aro.org,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, mikhail.golubev@...nsynergy.com,
anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com,
Vasyl Vavrychuk <Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com>,
Andriy Tryshnivskyy <Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] firmware: arm_scmi, smccc, mailbox: Make
shmem based transports optional
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:22 PM Peter Hilber
<peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
.....
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> menuconfig MAILBOX
> bool "Mailbox Hardware Support"
> + select ARM_SCMI_HAVE_SHMEM
> help
> Mailbox is a framework to control hardware communication between
> on-chip processors through queued messages and interrupt driven
>
Isn't this too generic?
Not all platforms, with a mailbox controller, use SCMI as the protocol.
thnx.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists