linux-kernel - [PATCH] evm: Check xattr size misalignment between kernel and user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:39:23 +0200
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
CC:     <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] evm: Check xattr size misalignment between kernel and user

The kernel and the user obtain an xattr value in two different ways:

kernel (EVM): uses vfs_getxattr_alloc() which obtains the xattr value from
              the filesystem handler (raw value);

user (ima-evm-utils): uses vfs_getxattr() which obtains the xattr value
                      from the LSMs (normalized value).

Normally, this does not have an impact unless security.selinux is set with
setfattr, with a value not terminated by '\0' (this is not the recommended
way, security.selinux should be set with the appropriate tools such as
chcon and restorecon).

In this case, the kernel and the user see two different xattr values: the
former sees the xattr value without '\0' (raw value), the latter sees the
value with '\0' (value normalized by SELinux).

This could result in two different verification outcomes from EVM and
ima-evm-utils, if a signature was calculated with a security.selinux value
terminated by '\0' and the value set in the filesystem is not terminated by
'\0'. The former would report verification failure due to the missing '\0',
while the latter would report verification success (because it gets the
normalized value with '\0').

This patch mitigates this issue by comparing in evm_calc_hmac_or_hash() the
size of the xattr returned by the two xattr functions and by warning the
user if there is a misalignment.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
index 96b22f2ac27a..462c5258322a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
 	size_t xattr_size = 0;
 	char *xattr_value = NULL;
 	int error;
-	int size;
+	int size, user_space_size;
 	bool ima_present = false;

 	if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) ||
@@ -276,6 +276,12 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
 		if (size < 0)
 			continue;

+		user_space_size = vfs_getxattr(&init_user_ns, dentry,
+					       xattr->name, NULL, 0);
+		if (user_space_size != size)
+			pr_debug("file %s: xattr %s size mismatch (kernel: %d, user: %d)\n",
+				 dentry->d_name.name, xattr->name, size,
+				 user_space_size);
 		error = 0;
 		xattr_size = size;
 		crypto_shash_update(desc, (const u8 *)xattr_value, xattr_size);
-- 
2.25.1