[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1624268198.nw42tdsihr.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:10:33 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf probe: Print a hint if adding a probe fails
Hi Arnaldo,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:29:26PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> Hi Naveen,
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:14:42 +0530
>> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Adding a probe can fail in a few scenarios. perf already checks for the
>> > address in the kprobe blacklist. However, the address could still be a
>> > jump label, or have a BUG_ON(). In such cases, it isn't always evident
>> > why adding the probe failed. Add a hint so that the user knows how to
>> > proceed.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> Since now there is <tracefs>/error_log, if you see any errors in registering
>> probe-events, perf probe should dump the error_log for the hint message.
>> Also, kprobes should return the correct different error code for each
>> errors.
>
> Was there any followup on this? I think we should do as Masami suggests,
> Naveen, could you do it?
Thanks for checking. We have been discussing this on the kernel side of
things here (sorry, missed copying you on that):
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210610085617.1590138-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I will work on the related changes to perf after the kernel changes.
Thanks,
Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists