[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ba202d9-a679-834a-685f-12c6f9eb9c38@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:18:38 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Prioritise Arm arch
timer on arm64
On 21/06/2021 12:10, Will Deacon wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> exynos4_mct_frc_start() is called unconditionally from probe via
>>> exynos4_clocksource_init() so as long as the mct probes first, then the
>>> arch timer should work, no? The rating shouldn't affect that.
>>
>> How do you ensure the exynos mct is probed before the arch timer ?
>>
>> The Makefile provides the right order, but the dependency is implicit.
>
> Currently, I think it's done by the order of the CPU hotplug notifiers (
> see the hunk of 6282edb72bed which touches cpuhotplug.h).
Ah, right. Indeed whatever the DT order, the cpuhotplug order solves the
dependency.
Chanwoo, are fine with this change ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists