linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 07/18] x86/paravirt: Use PVOP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210621120120.951672655@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:12:40 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        joro@...tes.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
        x86@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 07/18] x86/paravirt: Use PVOP_* for paravirt calls

Doing unconditional indirect calls through the pv_ops vector is weird.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ void __init paravirt_set_cap(void);
 /* The paravirtualized I/O functions */
 static inline void slow_down_io(void)
 {
-	pv_ops.cpu.io_delay();
+	PVOP_VCALL0(cpu.io_delay);
 #ifdef REALLY_SLOW_IO
-	pv_ops.cpu.io_delay();
-	pv_ops.cpu.io_delay();
-	pv_ops.cpu.io_delay();
+	PVOP_VCALL0(cpu.io_delay);
+	PVOP_VCALL0(cpu.io_delay);
+	PVOP_VCALL0(cpu.io_delay);
 #endif
 }