[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10eca4c6-999f-5d48-3fb3-4f8ab7d8b8b3@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:18:17 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Clark Willaims <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 12/12] trace/osnoise: Support hotplug operations
On 6/18/21 9:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:28:51 +0200
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1566,7 +1627,14 @@ osnoise_cpus_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf, size_t count,
>> osnoise_tracer_stop(tr);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&interface_lock);
>> + /*
>> + * osnoise_cpumask is ready by CPU hotplug operations.
>
> I don't understand the usage of "ready" above. Lost in translation?
>
> * osnoise_cpumask is updated by CPU hotplug operations.
I think I meant "read"... I will use your comment.
Thanks
-- Daniel
> ?
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>> + */
>> + get_online_cpus();
>> +
>> cpumask_copy(&osnoise_cpumask, osnoise_cpumask_new);
>> +
>> + put_online_cpus();
>> mutex_unlock(&interface_lock);
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists