linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:35:05 +0200
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luca Mariotti <mariottiluca1@...mail.it>,
        Holger Hoffstätte 
        <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
        Pietro Pedroni <pedroni.pietro.96@...il.com>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
        Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs

Hello.

On úterý 22. června 2021 9:08:43 CEST Paolo Valente wrote:
> CCing also Jan and Khazhy, because in your commit log I see also the
> commit on bfq_requests_merged().
> 
> Is this OOPS reproducible for you?

No, I haven't found a reproducer, at least yet. It took half a day of uptime 
to hit this, so might not be that easy.

-- 
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)