[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210624163218.39ae3ec6@xhacker.debian>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:32:18 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] timer: Use static_branch_likely() for timers_nohz_active
The static key timers_nohz_active is likely to be true, so use
static_branch_likely() to reflect this fact.
Per include/linux/jump_label.h:
* type\branch| likely (1) | unlikely (0)
* -----------+-----------------------+------------------
* | |
* true (1) | ... | ...
* | NOP | JMP L
* | <br-stmts> | 1: ...
* | L: ... |
* | |
* | | L: <br-stmts>
* | | jmp 1b
* | |
* -----------+-----------------------+------------------
This could improve the finally generated code a bit for the most likely
scenario, I.E save two "jmp" instructions.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
---
Since v1:
- update the commit msg to avoid confusing and add some descriptions about
where's the improvement from.
kernel/time/timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index d111adf4a0cb..40d4fe7fa207 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ int timer_migration_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
static inline bool is_timers_nohz_active(void)
{
- return static_branch_unlikely(&timers_nohz_active);
+ return static_branch_likely(&timers_nohz_active);
}
#else
static inline bool is_timers_nohz_active(void) { return false; }
--
2.31.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists