lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:00:16 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] timer: Use static_branch_likely() for timers_nohz_active Jisheng, On Thu, Jun 24 2021 at 16:32, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > The static key timers_nohz_active is likely to be true, so use > static_branch_likely() to reflect this fact. you still lack any justification for your statement that NOHZ active is likely. It might be likely for your system, but is this true in general? Thanks, tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists