linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1624530624.8jff1f4u11.astroid@bobo.none>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:34:25 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        David Stevens <stevensd@...gle.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64
 MMU

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> KVM supports mapping VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP memory into the guest by using
> follow_pte in gfn_to_pfn. However, the resolved pfns may not have
> assoicated struct pages, so they should not be passed to pfn_to_page.
> This series removes such calls from the x86 and arm64 secondary MMU. To
> do this, this series modifies gfn_to_pfn to return a struct page in
> addition to a pfn, if the hva was resolved by gup. This allows the
> caller to call put_page only when necessated by gup.
> 
> This series provides a helper function that unwraps the new return type
> of gfn_to_pfn to provide behavior identical to the old behavior. As I
> have no hardware to test powerpc/mips changes, the function is used
> there for minimally invasive changes. Additionally, as gfn_to_page and
> gfn_to_pfn_cache are not integrated with mmu notifier, they cannot be
> easily changed over to only use pfns.
> 
> This addresses CVE-2021-22543 on x86 and arm64.

Does this fix the problem? (untested I don't have a POC setup at hand,
but at least in concept)

I have no problem with improving the API and probably in the direction 
of your series is good. But there seems to be a lot of unfixed arch code 
and broken APIs remaining left to do after your series too. This might 
be most suitable to backport and as a base for your series that can take
more time to convert to new APIs.

Thanks,
Nick

---

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 6a6bc7af0e28..e208c279d903 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2104,13 +2104,21 @@ static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
 	 * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
 	 * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
+	 *
+	 * Certain IO or PFNMAP mappings can be backed with valid
+	 * struct pages, but be allocated without refcounting e.g.,
+	 * tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations, which
+	 * would then underflow the refcount when the caller does the
+	 * required put_page. Don't allow those pages here.
 	 */ 
-	kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
+	if (!kvm_try_get_pfn(pfn))
+		r = -EFAULT;
 
 out:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
 	*p_pfn = pfn;
-	return 0;
+
+	return r;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2487,6 +2495,13 @@ void kvm_set_pfn_accessed(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_pfn_accessed);
 
+static int kvm_try_get_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
+{
+	if (kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn))
+		return 1;
+	return get_page_unless_zero(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+}
+
 void kvm_get_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
 {
 	if (!kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn))