linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RFC] usb: renesas_usbhs: fifo: : use proper DMAENGINE API for termination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TY2PR01MB369273ACD098AD2868923A6ED8079@TY2PR01MB3692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:36:05 +0000
From:   Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
CC:     "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] usb: renesas_usbhs: fifo: : use proper DMAENGINE API
 for termination

Hi Wolfram-san,

> From: Wolfram Sang, Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 2:54 PM
> 
> Hi Shimoda-san,
> 
> > In backporting point of view, I guess it's better to apply my fixed patch at first,
> > and then apply this DMAENGINE patch. But, what do you think?
> 
> Yes, I agree. Could you kindly notify me when your patch is accepted
> upstream? Or CC me on your patch?

Thank you for your reply! I'll resend a patch with your email address on CC.

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda