[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFNMomw60BGObwF2ZOFriFwPnEk5hFZgC-5vJwJjPnrW3RyPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:34:38 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove redundant continue statement in a while-loop
Thank you. This change is correct also in view of the expected
behavior of the function
(it really is unnecessary).
I will send this to upstream.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:05 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The continue statement at the end of the while-loop is redundant,
> remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/btree.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
> index f42ab57201e7..ab9ec073330f 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
> @@ -738,7 +738,6 @@ static int nilfs_btree_lookup_contig(const struct nilfs_bmap *btree,
> if (ptr2 != ptr + cnt || ++cnt == maxblocks)
> goto end;
> index++;
> - continue;
> }
> if (level == maxlevel)
> break;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists