linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] scsi: ufs: Add flags pm_op_in_progress and is_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77b92c6e-2e1c-c799-f6ac-04467175f96a@acm.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:35:33 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        nguyenb@...eaurora.org, hongwus@...eaurora.org,
        ziqichen@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] scsi: ufs: Add flags pm_op_in_progress and
 is_sys_suspended

On 6/23/21 12:35 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> @@ -9141,6 +9143,8 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  
>  	if (!hba->is_powered)
>  		return 0;
> +
> +	hba->pm_op_in_progress = true;
>  	/*
>  	 * Disable the host irq as host controller as there won't be any
>  	 * host controller transaction expected till resume.
> @@ -9160,6 +9164,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(hba);
>  	/* Put the host controller in low power mode if possible */
>  	ufshcd_hba_vreg_set_lpm(hba);
> +	hba->pm_op_in_progress = false;
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -9179,6 +9184,7 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	if (!hba->is_powered)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	hba->pm_op_in_progress = true;
>  	ufshcd_hba_vreg_set_hpm(hba);
>  	ret = ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(hba);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -9198,6 +9204,7 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  out:
>  	if (ret)
>  		ufshcd_update_evt_hist(hba, UFS_EVT_RESUME_ERR, (u32)ret);
> +	hba->pm_op_in_progress = false;
>  	return ret;
>  }

Has it been considered to check dev->power.runtime_status instead of
introducing the pm_op_in_progress variable?

Thanks,

Bart.