lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2be5bb5342ae568c198d61f5e8a8b4515b61ba66.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:06:23 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC
 is destroyed

On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 15:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:04:53AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> > Oh sorry I thought the patch would go via x86/sgx branch
> 
> We usually send fixes through tip's urgent branches because they go
> straight to Linus and not wait for the merge window.
> 
> > and I didn't monitor the tip-bot2 mail which was moved to my local x86
> > folder.
> 
> That's not optimal because those tip-bot notifications are *exactly* for
> that - to let the involved parties know that the patch has been queued.
> 

Got it. Thanks for remaindering.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ