linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNXej3ru9kxQugvR@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:47:59 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is
 destroyed

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:04:53AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> Oh sorry I thought the patch would go via x86/sgx branch

We usually send fixes through tip's urgent branches because they go
straight to Linus and not wait for the merge window.

> and I didn't monitor the tip-bot2 mail which was moved to my local x86
> folder.

That's not optimal because those tip-bot notifications are *exactly* for
that - to let the involved parties know that the patch has been queued.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette