[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210625163701.407a2561@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:37:01 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:34:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:28:15 +1000 Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/24/21 7:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > mm/page_reporting.c:14:37: error: initializer element is not constant
> > > 14 | unsigned int page_reporting_order = pageblock_order;
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 223f64d9e679 ("mm/page_reporting: export reporting order as module parameter")
> > >
> > > pageblock_order is defined to be various things depending on CONFIG_
> > > symbols.
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit (and the following three) for today.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, Please drop this series for now.
> >
> > The v3 was applied and caused the build error. Actually, we need
> > v5, which was posted couple of hours ago.
> >
> > v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/24/1137
>
> Which version is in today's mmotm?
hmm, looks like v4. So do I drop these again today?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists