[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5742c419-f852-46b3-5c32-0334ebcc87c2@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:56:58 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
On 6/25/21 4:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:34:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:28:15 +1000 Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/24/21 7:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>>>
>>>> mm/page_reporting.c:14:37: error: initializer element is not constant
>>>> 14 | unsigned int page_reporting_order = pageblock_order;
>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>
>>>> 223f64d9e679 ("mm/page_reporting: export reporting order as module parameter")
>>>>
>>>> pageblock_order is defined to be various things depending on CONFIG_
>>>> symbols.
>>>>
>>>> I have reverted that commit (and the following three) for today.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, Please drop this series for now.
>>>
>>> The v3 was applied and caused the build error. Actually, we need
>>> v5, which was posted couple of hours ago.
>>>
>>> v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/24/1137
>>
>> Which version is in today's mmotm?
>
> hmm, looks like v4. So do I drop these again today?
>
Stephen, lets keep v4 and I will send patch to fill the gap between v4/v5
if no one objects. Sorry for the extra work.
Thanks,
Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists