linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] math64: New DIV_U64_ROUND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWfE7UKkp6=MdAVgHywFjDK3SN4m9+d_6AmJTB=qBEqFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 19:39:10 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Vid <vladimir.vid@...tura.hr>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] math64: New DIV_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST helper

Hi Willy,

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:50 PM Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:38:03PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 25 June 2021 17:22:31 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * DIV_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST - unsigned 64bit divide with 32bit divisor rounded to nearest integer
> > > > + * @dividend: unsigned 64bit dividend
> > > > + * @divisor: unsigned 32bit divisor
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Divide unsigned 64bit dividend by unsigned 32bit divisor
> > > > + * and round to closest integer.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: dividend / divisor rounded to nearest integer
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define DIV_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(dividend, divisor)       \
> > > > +       ({ u32 _tmp = (divisor); div_u64((u64)(dividend) + _tmp / 2, _tmp); })
> > >
> > > Given "dividend" should already be an unsigned 64-bit value, I don't
> > > think the cast to "u64" is needed. Similar macros in this file also
> > > don't have the cast.
> >
> > It is just to ensure that plus operation between dividend and _tmp is
> > evaluated in 64-bit context to prevent overflow. Just a case when user
> > calls this macro with 32-bit dividend param. As it is a macro (and not
> > inline function) type is not automatically enforced.
>
> I agree, a large u32 argument added to _tmp/2 could overflow and remain
> 32 bits, yielding an incorrect result. The cast is mandatory here (and
> will either emit no code, or be useful).

Fair enough.
So we want to add a cast to DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST() above, too?

> The only trap I'm seeing is if a negative signed int is passed in dividend,
> it will be sign-extended and will give a large u64 value. A preliminary
> u32 cast could avoid this but would break valid u64 arguments, and I'd
> claim we never know what the user wants if this happens in the first place.

Yep.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds