linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] fpga: dfl: fme: Fix cpu hotplug code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210628090146.GA80012@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:01:46 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To:     Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     will@...nel.org, hao.wu@...el.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        trix@...hat.com, luwei.kang@...el.com, mdf@...nel.org,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] fpga: dfl: fme: Fix cpu hotplug code

It's a good fix, you can drop the RFC in commit title. :)

The title could be more specific, like:

    fpga: dfl: fme: Fix cpu hotplug issue in performance reporting

So we know it is for performance reporting feature at first glance.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:45:46PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:

> Commit 724142f8c42a ("fpga: dfl: fme: add performance
> reporting support") added performance reporting support
> for FPGA management engine via perf.

May drop this section, it is indicated in the Fixes tag.

> 
> It also added cpu hotplug feature but it didn't add

The performance reporting driver added cpu hotplug ...

> pmu migration call in cpu offline function.
> This can create an issue incase the current designated
> cpu being used to collect fme pmu data got offline,
> as based on current code we are not migrating fme pmu to
> new target cpu. Because of that perf will still try to
> fetch data from that offline cpu and hence we will not
> get counter data.
> 
> Patch fixed this issue by adding pmu_migrate_context call
> in fme_perf_offline_cpu function.
> 
> Fixes: 724142f8c42a ("fpga: dfl: fme: add performance reporting support")
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>

Tested-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>

Thanks,
Yilun

> ---
>  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> ---
> - This fix patch is not tested (as I don't have required environment).
>   But issue mentioned in the commit msg can be re-created, by starting any
>   fme_perf event and while its still running, offline current designated
>   cpu pointed by cpumask file. Since current code didn't migrating pmu,
>   perf gonna try getting counts from that offlined cpu and hence we will
>   not get event data.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> index 4299145ef347..b9a54583e505 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> @@ -953,6 +953,10 @@ static int fme_perf_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	priv->cpu = target;
> +
> +	/* Migrate fme_perf pmu events to the new target cpu */
> +	perf_pmu_migrate_context(&priv->pmu, cpu, target);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1