[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNmRXdFCGfoXw2zG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:07:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, x86@...nel.org,
mbenes@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, dvyukov@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/24] objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:41AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Turns out the compilers also generate tail calls to __sanitize_cov*(),
> > make sure to also patch those out in noinstr code.
> >
> > Fixes: 0f1441b44e82 ("objtool: Fix noinstr vs KCOV")
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks! More reason to not even try to do the same for other
> architectures, and the compiler needing the attribute...
Agreed!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists