[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210628141300.GA5710@lothringen>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:13:00 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com" <hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'mgorman@...e.de'" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"'mingo@...nel.org'" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"'tglx@...utronix.de'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'juri.lelli@...hat.com'" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"'vincent.guittot@...aro.org'" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"'fweisbec@...il.com'" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"'dietmar.eggemann@....com'" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"'rostedt@...dmis.org'" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"'bsegall@...gle.com'" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"'bristot@...hat.com'" <bristot@...hat.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Utime and stime are less when getrusage (RUSAGE_THREAD) is
executed on a tickless CPU.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 02:36:27AM +0000, hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com wrote:
> Hi Frederic, Peter, and Mel
>
> > I tested this and confirmed that it gives accurate values.
> > Also, task_sched_runtime () is done only on nohz_full CPU, so I think
> > it's a better idea than before.
> > I hope you will incorporate this fix into your mainline.
>
> I have also confirmed that CPUs other than nohz_full have very little overhead.
> Please consider merging it into the mainline.
Ok, I'm going to submit a proper patch.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists