[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB2183EDD7935603BDD26825D3EBE39@OSBPR01MB2183.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:24:04 +0000
From: "hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com" <hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'mgorman@...e.de'" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"'mingo@...nel.org'" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"'tglx@...utronix.de'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'juri.lelli@...hat.com'" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"'vincent.guittot@...aro.org'" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: "'fweisbec@...il.com'" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"'dietmar.eggemann@....com'" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"'rostedt@...dmis.org'" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"'bsegall@...gle.com'" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"'bristot@...hat.com'" <bristot@...hat.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Utime and stime are less when getrusage (RUSAGE_THREAD) is
executed on a tickless CPU.
Hi Frederic
> > I have also confirmed that CPUs other than nohz_full have very little overhead.
> > Please consider merging it into the mainline.
>
> Ok, I'm going to submit a proper patch.
I'm looking forward to posting your patch.
Do you have a specific plan? I would like to know the rough period
until this correction is made.
Thanks.
Hitomi Hasegawa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists