lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210629014058.GB85916@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:40:58 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>,
        Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hwmon: intel-m10-bmc-hwmon: add n5010 sensors

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28:28AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:35:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> > > From: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>
> > > 
> > > Add the list of sensors supported by the Silicom n5010 PAC, and enable
> > > the drivers as a subtype of the intel-m10-bmc multi-function driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>
> > 
> > For my reference:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
> > 
> > Not sure if I can apply this patch as-is to hwmon, or if it needs
> > to wait for the other patches in the series. Any thoughts / comments ?
> 
> I don't see how it would break anything in itself since it just adds
> extra compatible and data.
> 
> I'd probably wait with applying until discussions around the mfd and dfl
> parts are resolved since otherwise there's no user.
> 
> > Guenter
> 
> Thanks,
> Moritz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ