linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: spi-altera-dfl: support n5010 feature revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210629113533.GA4613@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:35:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>,
        Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: spi-altera-dfl: support n5010 feature
 revision

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:39:23AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:

> Since this depends on the previous patch: Mark do you want to take both
> patches once they're reviewed? From what I can tell the BMC and HWMON
> don't directly depend on it, so taking them through SPI tree might be
> easiest.

> Alternatively I can provide a tag for the DFL change for you to pull.

Sure, I can do whichever - I guess me applying both is probably
simplest?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)