linux-kernel - [PATCH] ACPI / amba: Fix resource name in /proc/iomem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210629112748.23734-1-zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:27:48 +0800
From:   Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / amba: Fix resource name in /proc/iomem

In function amba_handler_attach(), dev->res.name is initialized by
amba_device_alloc. But when address_found is false, dev->res.name is
assigned to null value, which leads to wrong resource name display in
/proc/iomem, "<BAD>" is seen for those resources.

Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
index 49b781a9cd97..ab8a4e0191b1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static int amba_handler_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 		case IORESOURCE_MEM:
 			if (!address_found) {
 				dev->res = *rentry->res;
+				dev->res.name = dev_name(&dev->dev);
 				address_found = true;
 			}
 			break;
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b