[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNsMo7UOBZrL5Dht@debian>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:05:55 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/71] 5.4.129-rc1 review
Hi Sasha,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28:53AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.129 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed 30 Jun 2021 02:29:43 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 65 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists