linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/71] 5.4.129-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3ebfc9b-ab6f-db28-f64a-a6cdd0bf2dfd@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 08:00:02 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/71] 5.4.129-rc1 review

On 6/29/21 12:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 02:57:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 6/28/21 8:28 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.129 release.
>>> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed 30 Jun 2021 02:29:43 PM UTC.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>           https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.4.y&id2=v5.4.128
>>
>> My tools are failing on this link. Is it possible to keep the rc patch
>> convention consistent with Greg KH's naming scheme?
> 
> What is failing on this, the use of "&" in the link?  The patch itself
> from this link works for me.
> 

The link itself is good. My scripts assumes patch-5.4.128-rc1.gz naming
convention. I can adjust my scripts to work with either.

Easier to adjust my script if it is a pain to adjust on your end. :)

thanks,
-- Shuah