lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 23:19:59 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4 0/4] perf stat: Enable BPF counters with --for-each-cgroup

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 8:29 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:18 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is to add BPF support for --for-each-cgroup to handle many cgroup
> > events on big machines.  You can use the --bpf-counters to enable the
> > new behavior.
> >
> >  * changes in v4
> >   - convert cgrp_readings to a per-cpu array map
> >   - remove now-unused cpu_idx map
> >   - move common functions to a header file
> >   - reuse bpftool bootstrap binary
> >   - fix build error in the cgroup code
> >
> >  * changes in v3
> >   - support cgroup hierarchy with ancestor ids
> >   - add and trigger raw_tp BPF program
> >   - add a build rule for vmlinux.h
> >
> >  * changes in v2
> >   - remove incorrect use of BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS
> >   - add missing map elements after lookup
> >   - handle cgroup v1
> >
> > Basic idea is to use a single set of per-cpu events to count
> > interested events and aggregate them to each cgroup.  I used bperf
> > mechanism to use a BPF program for cgroup-switches and save the
> > results in a matching map element for given cgroups.
> >
> > Without this, we need to have separate events for cgroups, and it
> > creates unnecessary multiplexing overhead (and PMU programming) when
> > tasks in different cgroups are switched.  I saw this makes a big
> > difference on 256 cpu machines with hundreds of cgroups.
> >
> > Actually this is what I wanted to do it in the kernel [1], but we can
> > do the job using BPF!
>
> Ugh, I found the current kernel bpf verifier doesn't accept the
> bpf_get_current_ancestor_cgroup_id() helper.  Will send the fix
> to BPF folks.

The fix landed on the bpf-next tree.

Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ