lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:25:44 +0000
From:   "Zeh, Werner" <werner.zeh@...mens.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: [PATCH 1/1] x86/kernel/rtc: add sanity check for RTC date and
 time

Hi Alexandre

> Hello,
> 
> On 24/06/2021 10:15:07+0200, Werner Zeh wrote:
> > The timekeeper is synchronized with the CMOS RTC when it is initialized.
> > If the RTC buffering is bad (not buffered at all, empty battery) the
> > RTC registers can contain random data. In order to avoid date and time
> > being completely rubbish check the sanity of the registers before
> > calling mktime64. If the values are not valid, set tv_sec to 0 so that
> > at least the starting time is valid.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@...mens.com>
> > ---
> > [resent due to wrong lkml address]
> > [added RTC maintainers to the recipients] This change introduces the
> > same validity check that is already done in drivers/rtc/interface.c.
> > If it is not done here, the timekeeper can be set up wrongly in the
> > first run and won't be corrected once the RTC driver is started
> > because the validity check in the RTC driver drops the time and date
> > due to invalid entries.
> >
> >  arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c index
> > 586f718b8e95..f4af7b18c6c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/pnp.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/rtc.h>
> >
> >  #include <asm/vsyscall.h>
> >  #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> > @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ void mach_get_cmos_time(struct timespec64 *now)
> {
> >  	unsigned int status, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec, century = 0;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> > +	struct rtc_time tm = {0};
> >
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If pm_trace abused the RTC as storage, set the timespec to 0, @@
> > -118,7 +120,15 @@ void mach_get_cmos_time(struct timespec64 *now)
> >  	} else
> >  		year += CMOS_YEARS_OFFS;
> >
> > -	now->tv_sec = mktime64(year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
> > +	tm.tm_sec = sec;
> > +	tm.tm_min = min;
> > +	tm.tm_hour = hour;
> > +	tm.tm_mday = day;
> > +	tm.tm_mon = mon;
> > +	tm.tm_year = year;
> > +	now->tv_sec = 0;
> > +	if (rtc_valid_tm(&tm) == 0)
> 
> Doesn't that make the x86 architecture depend on CONFIG_RTC_LIB?
> 
CONFIG_RTC_LIB is already default enabled for x86, see arch/x86/Kconfig.
Do you have any other dependencies in mind I have overseen?

Werner

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ