[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01f1b032-14a8-a6fa-9063-23de65fc6f43@kleine-koenig.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:31:09 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To: Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore@...hat.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: helios64: fixup USB setup
Hello,
On 7/1/21 2:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Without the usbdrd_dwc3_1 node defined u-boot will throw an error and
> reset the system.
I wonder if this should better be fixed in u-boot then?!
> All other rk3399 systems use this format
This is true for the dwc nodes, however for the usb2 nodes there are
several that use this idiom (and even repeat the label name), see for
example the &u2phy0 node in
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi .
In my eyes it's a bit ugly to have the two nodes as separate entities
and on the same indentation level in the machine dts given that one is
the parent of the other and enabling USB needs both status settings.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists