linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm8x50: add mmcx power domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpXD3rCmp53LFFYky_xQv9ucofvTezG5qWyDZt427chNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:16:53 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm8x50: add mmcx
 power domain

On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 15:31, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On sm8250 dispcc requires MMCX power domain to be powered up before
> clock controller's registers become available. For now sm8250 was using
> external regulator driven by the power domain to describe this
> relationship. Switch into specifying power-domain and required opp-state
> directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> index 0cdf53f41f84..48d86fb34fa7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> @@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>
> +  power-domains:
> +    description:
> +      A phandle and PM domain specifier for the MMCX power domain.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +

Should you perhaps state that this is a parent domain? Or it isn't?

Related to this and because this is a power domain provider, you
should probably reference the common power-domain bindings somewhere
here. Along the lines of this:

- $ref: power-domain.yaml#

As an example, you could have a look at
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.yaml.

> +  required-opps:
> +    description:
> +      Performance state to use for MMCX to enable register access.
> +    maxItems: 1

According to the previous discussions, I was under the assumption that
this property belongs to a consumer node rather than in the provider
node, no?

> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -64,6 +74,15 @@ required:
>    - '#reset-cells'
>    - '#power-domain-cells'
>
> +# Either both properties are present or both are absent
> +dependencies:
> +  power-domains:
> +    required:
> +      - required-opps
> +  required-opps:
> +    required:
> +      - power-domains
> +
>  additionalProperties: false
>
>  examples:
> --
> 2.30.2
>

Kind regards
Uffe