linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: sd: send REQUEST SENSE for BLIST_MEDIA_CHANGE devices in runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:43:31 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     jejb@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, kernel@...i.sm,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: sd: send REQUEST SENSE for
 BLIST_MEDIA_CHANGE devices in runtime_resume()

On 7/2/21 1:04 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 01.07.2021 um 15:49 +0100 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:44:52AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>>> +       struct scsi_disk *sdkp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +       struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
>>> +       int timeout, res;
>>> +
>>> +       timeout = sdp->request_queue->rq_timeout *
>>> SD_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER;
>>
>> Is REQUEST SENSE reqlly a so slow operation on these devices that
>> we need to override the timeout?
> 
> using SD_TIMEOUT works equally fine for me. Is that what you'd rather
> like to see?
> 
> Bart, is SD_TIMEOUT equally ok for you? If so, I'll resend with your
> reviewed-by.

Hi Martin,

I prefer sdp->request_queue->rq_timeout instead of SD_TIMEOUT since the 
former is configurable via sysfs.

Thanks,

Bart.