[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210705084453.2151729-2-elver@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:44:53 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: elver@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
glider@...gle.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
omosnace@...hat.com, serge@...lyn.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf: Refactor permissions check into perf_check_permission()
Refactor the permission check in perf_event_open() into a helper
perf_check_permission(). This makes the permission check logic more
readable (because we no longer have a negated disjunction). Add a
comment mentioning the ptrace check also checks the uid.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
---
v3:
* Introduce this patch to refactor the permissions checking logic to
make it more readable (reported by Eric W. Biederman).
---
kernel/events/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index f79ee82e644a..3008b986994b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -11912,6 +11912,37 @@ __perf_event_ctx_lock_double(struct perf_event *group_leader,
return gctx;
}
+static bool
+perf_check_permission(struct perf_event_attr *attr, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ unsigned int ptrace_mode = PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS;
+ bool is_capable = perfmon_capable();
+
+ if (attr->sigtrap) {
+ /*
+ * perf_event_attr::sigtrap sends signals to the other task.
+ * Require the current task to also have CAP_KILL.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ is_capable &= ns_capable(__task_cred(task)->user_ns, CAP_KILL);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /*
+ * If the required capabilities aren't available, checks for
+ * ptrace permissions: upgrade to ATTACH, since sending signals
+ * can effectively change the target task.
+ */
+ ptrace_mode = PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Preserve ptrace permission check for backwards compatibility. The
+ * ptrace check also includes checks that the current task and other
+ * task have matching uids, and is therefore not done here explicitly.
+ */
+ return is_capable || ptrace_may_access(task, ptrace_mode);
+}
+
/**
* sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu
*
@@ -12152,43 +12183,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
}
if (task) {
- unsigned int ptrace_mode = PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS;
- bool is_capable;
-
err = down_read_interruptible(&task->signal->exec_update_lock);
if (err)
goto err_file;
- is_capable = perfmon_capable();
- if (attr.sigtrap) {
- /*
- * perf_event_attr::sigtrap sends signals to the other
- * task. Require the current task to also have
- * CAP_KILL.
- */
- rcu_read_lock();
- is_capable &= ns_capable(__task_cred(task)->user_ns, CAP_KILL);
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- /*
- * If the required capabilities aren't available, checks
- * for ptrace permissions: upgrade to ATTACH, since
- * sending signals can effectively change the target
- * task.
- */
- ptrace_mode = PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS;
- }
-
/*
- * Preserve ptrace permission check for backwards compatibility.
- *
* We must hold exec_update_lock across this and any potential
* perf_install_in_context() call for this new event to
* serialize against exec() altering our credentials (and the
* perf_event_exit_task() that could imply).
*/
err = -EACCES;
- if (!is_capable && !ptrace_may_access(task, ptrace_mode))
+ if (!perf_check_permission(&attr, task))
goto err_cred;
}
--
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists