[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210705154324.GA41292@pc638.lan>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 17:43:24 +0200
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Use batched page requests in bulk-allocator
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 04:55:47PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > + if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> > + cond_resched();
>
> How does one call vmalloc() with gfp flags that _don't_ allow blocking?
> They have to allow a GFP_KERNEL allocation of the page tables.
> So I think this should be an unconditional cond_resched().
Historically it is there. I decided to align with below code. But i agree
vmalloc is sleepable anyway, so blocking is supposed.
OK, i will respin and send out two patches.
--
Vlad Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists