[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:09:25 +0000
From: "embedded (VIVAVIS AG)" <embedded@...avis.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Voltage and current regulator: usage of 'regulators' parent node in
device tree
I see a lot of Devicetrees wrapping the regulator nodes within a parent node
like this
regulators {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg_p3v3: regulator@0 {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
[...]
regulator-always-on;
};
[...]
Contrary to that, patches exist removing the 'regulators' node, because the 'simple-bus'
doesn't really exist in hardware. Unfortunately, the documentation is unclear about
wrapping regulator nodes like shown above.
Should I avoid the parent 'regulators' node?
Is the given naming schema in fixed-regulator.yaml best practice to follow?
reg_xyz: regulator-xyz {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "xyz";
Thank you for clarification.
Carsten Stelling
Powered by blists - more mailing lists