linux-kernel - Re: Voltage and current regulator: usage of 'regulators' parent node in device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:29:42 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "embedded (VIVAVIS AG)" <embedded@...avis.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Voltage and current regulator: usage of 'regulators' parent node
 in device tree

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:09:25PM +0000, embedded (VIVAVIS AG) wrote:

> Should I avoid the parent 'regulators' node?

You should ask the DT maintainers, I don't really mind either way TBH.
My understanding was to avoid the parent node but can't remember why or
if it was important.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)