lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeWHt-z_2Lb=mJmm6yz_cAG_ywzH5zbWG2KN1sRvA6KZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:02:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        gregory.0xf0@...il.com,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
        John Thomson <git@...nthomson.fastmail.com.au>,
        NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: convert 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names' to
 support multiple gpiochip per device

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:04 AM Sergio Paracuellos
<sergio.paracuellos@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There are some unfortunate cases where the DT representation
> of the device and the Linux internal representation differs.
> Such drivers for devices are forced to implement a custom function
> to avoid the core code 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names' to be executed
> since in any other case every gpiochip inside will got repeated
> names through its internal gpiochip banks. To avoid this antipattern
> this changes are introduced trying to adapt core 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names'
> to get a correct behaviour for every single situation.
>
> This series introduces a new 'offset' field in the gpiochip structure
> that can be used for those unfortunate drivers that must define multiple
> gpiochips per device.
>
> Drivers affected by this situation are also updated. These are
> 'gpio-mt7621' and 'gpio-brcmstb'.
>
> Motivation for this series available at [0].
>
> Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Thanks for doing this!
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

> Best regards,
>     Sergio Paracuellos
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/26/198
>
> Sergio Paracuellos (3):
>   gpiolib: convert 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names' to support multiple
>     gpiochip baks per device
>   gpio: mt7621: support gpio-line-names property
>   gpio: brcmstb: remove custom 'brcmstb_gpio_set_names'
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 45 +------------------------------------
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  4 ++++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ