[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrO-KcrPWBLGvS9hO+rLJjr=yx1766Np2M8HHApgkwNKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:34:11 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the mmc-fixes tree
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 02:32, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5c0777665b3e ("mmc: core: Use kref in place of struct mmc_blk_data::usage")
>
> from the mmc-fixes tree and commits:
>
> 249cda3325e0 ("mmc: remove an extra blk_{get,put}_queue pair")
> 607d968a5769 ("mmc: switch to blk_mq_alloc_disk")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Stephen, thanks for the heads up!
Jens, I noticed that you sent the PR with the mmc commits as of
yesterday. Assuming Linus will pull it before rc1, I will rebase and
fix up the conflict from my fixes branch on top. No action needed from
your side.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> diff --cc drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index d7b5c5ab75fa,9890a1532cb0..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@@ -195,26 -196,18 +195,25 @@@ static inline int mmc_get_devidx(struc
> return devidx;
> }
>
> -static void mmc_blk_put(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
> +static void mmc_blk_kref_release(struct kref *ref)
> {
> - mutex_lock(&open_lock);
> - md->usage--;
> - if (md->usage == 0) {
> - int devidx = mmc_get_devidx(md->disk);
> + struct mmc_blk_data *md = container_of(ref, struct mmc_blk_data, kref);
> + int devidx;
>
> - ida_simple_remove(&mmc_blk_ida, devidx);
> - put_disk(md->disk);
> - kfree(md);
> - }
> + devidx = mmc_get_devidx(md->disk);
> - blk_put_queue(md->queue.queue);
> + ida_simple_remove(&mmc_blk_ida, devidx);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&open_lock);
> + md->disk->private_data = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&open_lock);
> +
> + put_disk(md->disk);
> + kfree(md);
> +}
> +
> +static void mmc_blk_put(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
> +{
> + kref_put(&md->kref, mmc_blk_kref_release);
> }
>
> static ssize_t power_ro_lock_show(struct device *dev,
> @@@ -2334,27 -2327,11 +2333,11 @@@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_all
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&md->part);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&md->rpmbs);
> - md->usage = 1;
> + kref_init(&md->kref);
> -
> - ret = mmc_init_queue(&md->queue, card);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_putdisk;
> -
> md->queue.blkdata = md;
>
> - /*
> - * Keep an extra reference to the queue so that we can shutdown the
> - * queue (i.e. call blk_cleanup_queue()) while there are still
> - * references to the 'md'. The corresponding blk_put_queue() is in
> - * mmc_blk_put().
> - */
> - if (!blk_get_queue(md->queue.queue)) {
> - mmc_cleanup_queue(&md->queue);
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_putdisk;
> - }
> -
> md->disk->major = MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR;
> + md->disk->minors = perdev_minors;
> md->disk->first_minor = devidx * perdev_minors;
> md->disk->fops = &mmc_bdops;
> md->disk->private_data = md;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists