lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210709103244.64b2f1de@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:32:44 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the mmc-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/mmc/core/block.c

between commit:

  5c0777665b3e ("mmc: core: Use kref in place of struct mmc_blk_data::usage")

from the mmc-fixes tree and commits:

  249cda3325e0 ("mmc: remove an extra blk_{get,put}_queue pair")
  607d968a5769 ("mmc: switch to blk_mq_alloc_disk")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index d7b5c5ab75fa,9890a1532cb0..000000000000
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@@ -195,26 -196,18 +195,25 @@@ static inline int mmc_get_devidx(struc
  	return devidx;
  }
  
 -static void mmc_blk_put(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
 +static void mmc_blk_kref_release(struct kref *ref)
  {
 -	mutex_lock(&open_lock);
 -	md->usage--;
 -	if (md->usage == 0) {
 -		int devidx = mmc_get_devidx(md->disk);
 +	struct mmc_blk_data *md = container_of(ref, struct mmc_blk_data, kref);
 +	int devidx;
  
 -		ida_simple_remove(&mmc_blk_ida, devidx);
 -		put_disk(md->disk);
 -		kfree(md);
 -	}
 +	devidx = mmc_get_devidx(md->disk);
- 	blk_put_queue(md->queue.queue);
 +	ida_simple_remove(&mmc_blk_ida, devidx);
 +
 +	mutex_lock(&open_lock);
 +	md->disk->private_data = NULL;
  	mutex_unlock(&open_lock);
 +
 +	put_disk(md->disk);
 +	kfree(md);
 +}
 +
 +static void mmc_blk_put(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
 +{
 +	kref_put(&md->kref, mmc_blk_kref_release);
  }
  
  static ssize_t power_ro_lock_show(struct device *dev,
@@@ -2334,27 -2327,11 +2333,11 @@@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_all
  
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&md->part);
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&md->rpmbs);
 -	md->usage = 1;
 +	kref_init(&md->kref);
- 
- 	ret = mmc_init_queue(&md->queue, card);
- 	if (ret)
- 		goto err_putdisk;
- 
  	md->queue.blkdata = md;
  
- 	/*
- 	 * Keep an extra reference to the queue so that we can shutdown the
- 	 * queue (i.e. call blk_cleanup_queue()) while there are still
- 	 * references to the 'md'. The corresponding blk_put_queue() is in
- 	 * mmc_blk_put().
- 	 */
- 	if (!blk_get_queue(md->queue.queue)) {
- 		mmc_cleanup_queue(&md->queue);
- 		ret = -ENODEV;
- 		goto err_putdisk;
- 	}
- 
  	md->disk->major	= MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR;
+ 	md->disk->minors = perdev_minors;
  	md->disk->first_minor = devidx * perdev_minors;
  	md->disk->fops = &mmc_bdops;
  	md->disk->private_data = md;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ