linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YO34eTRpEQKuCzpW@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:32:57 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:24:06PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> Hi Al,
> 
> Where would you prefer for kernel-doc changes in fs/*.[ch] be merged?
> 
> E.g., from June 27:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210628014613.11296-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/

Umm...  I'd been under impression that kernel-doc stuff in general goes
through akpm, TBH.  I don't remember ever having a problem with your
patches of that sort; I can grab that kind of stuff, but if there's
an existing pipeline for that I'd just as well leave it there...