[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <691ef4d4-c8aa-e953-5062-f238f139395e@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:43:38 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1
On 7/13/21 1:32 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:24:06PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> Where would you prefer for kernel-doc changes in fs/*.[ch] be merged?
>>
>> E.g., from June 27:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210628014613.11296-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
>
> Umm... I'd been under impression that kernel-doc stuff in general goes
> through akpm, TBH. I don't remember ever having a problem with your
> patches of that sort; I can grab that kind of stuff, but if there's
> an existing pipeline for that I'd just as well leave it there...
>
Jon Corbet has merged some of them, but I'll be glad to send them to
akpm. Thanks.
{adding Cc: akpm for his info}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists