[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YO1Ob18YsDdEMfuf@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:27:27 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, sre@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mfd: rn5t618: Extend ADC support
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Add iio map to make voltage_now related channels accessible to power
> driver.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - use scale functions
> - add acks
>
> Changes in v2:
> - use iio_map instead of devicetree to allow mapping which does not
> block future extension by devicetree.
>
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
Doh!
> Andreas Kemnade (2):
> iio: adc: rn5t618: Add iio map
> power: supply: rn5t618: Add voltage_now property
>
> drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 2 ++
> drivers/power/supply/rn5t618_power.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
Not sure I get this.
Firstly, the cover-letter is marked as MFD, but no MFD changes occur.
Secondly, I am only in receipt of the 0th patch which seems odd. IMHO
patch sets should be sent threaded and all parties should see
discussion on all patches regardless of whether they maintain them or
not, since the overall conversation is often useful/relevant to all.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists