linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cacheinfo: clear cache_leaves(cpu) in free_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c84bc06b-b6c8-38b6-00a4-eb3e623b896e@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:01:42 +0800
From:   Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....cm>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cacheinfo: clear cache_leaves(cpu) in
 free_cache_attributes()



On 2021/7/14 1:48, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:38:15PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> If you like. If there is nothing broken its hard to care.
>> I guess this helps people doing backports.
>>
> 
> Thanks James, indeed I was trying to avoid unnecessary backport.
> 
> Xiongfeng,
> 
> Please don't add any fixes and post the patch with my Reviewed-by, we can

Sorry, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by tag in the new version.

> then ask Greg to pick. I am fine with the patch as is, it is nice to have
> as it ensures teardown is more complete but it doesn't fix anything
> in upstream or stable trees.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> .
>