linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e8c0640-d781-877c-e6c5-ed5cc09443f6@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:18:24 +0200
From:   Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

On 14.07.2021 18:05, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> In short I'd say: missing feedback.
> 
> Uh, with all due respect: Fuck you.
> 
> I've provided feedback, and Paragon have done a fantastic job of
> responding to it.  Pretending that the filesystem has simply been
> ignored is hugely disrespectful of my time and those at Paragon.
> 
> I'm supportive of ntfs3 being included, FWIW.  It looks to be
> in much better shape than the existing fs/ntfs.

Thanks you for kind words before even trying to clarify the situation.

What I meant (but failed to write clearly) is missing feedback on *the
latest* patchset.

I highly appreciate everyone who took time and helped polishing that
filesystem to its latest form.