linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YO8OP7vzHIuKvO6X@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:18:07 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:13:52AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Porting to fs/iomap can be done after merge, so long as the ntfs3
> driver doesn't depend on crazy reworking of buffer heads or whatever.
> AFAICT it didn't, so ... yes, my earlier statements still apply: "later
> as a clean up".

I on the other hand hate piling up mor of this legacy stuff, as it tends
to not be cleaned up by the submitted.  Example: erofs still hasn't
switched to iomap despite broad claims, also we still have a huge
backlog in the switch to the new mount API.